A week later, Pilar
and Kathy meet again. They are with their dogs again
|
Pilar
|
Good morning,
Kathy, How are you?
|
Kathy
|
Fine Pilar, Good
morning!
|
Pilar
|
It’s cold today
but it was necessary to walk with Kevin
|
Kathy
|
Yes, I know, I am
walking to Ralphi also.
|
Pilar
|
I was thinking
about last our conversation last week about dogs. You told me that we could
continue talking about the New York Times article. What is the article’s
name?
|
Kathy
|
The name is “Dogs
Are People Too, by Bern, who I talked you aboutlast week.
|
Pilar
|
I would like to know
more about this. Can you talk to me about this?
|
Kathy
|
Yes, I can. This
scientist wrote a controversial article, and he says that the dogs should
have the same rights as humans
|
Pilar
|
Did he find proofs
in his experiments with M.R.I.?
|
Kathy
|
Yes, he did.
|
Pilar
|
How many dogs did
he study to have this big deduction?
|
Kathy
|
He worked with
dozens and dozens of volunteer dogs for about two years.
|
Pilar
|
What does
“volunteer dogs” means?
|
Kathy
|
It means that the
dogs can choose whether they want to do the test, because Bern is conscious
that the dogs feel the same as humans.
|
Pilar
|
Why does he say
that the dogs feel the same as us? Is difficult to say this because you can’t
ask a dog why he does something and you can’t ask him how he feels.
|
Kathy
|
Yes this is true,
all about animal sentience and emotions had been unanswerable until now,
thanks the M.R.I s can tell us about dog’s internal states when the dogs are
in their natural state without an
anesthetized animal and this is possible because the dogs are trying to keep
absolutely still themselves during the procedure. From the beginning, the
scientists treated the dogs as people.
They had a
consent form, which was modeled after a child’s consent form but signed by
the dog’s owner. Then they emphasized that participation was voluntary, and
that the dog had the right to quit the study. They used only positive
training methods. No sedation. No restraints. If the dogs didn’t want to be
in the M.R.I scanner, they could leave. Same as any human volunteer.
|
Pilar
|
I think that this
is correct, because they also feel; I can to see with my dog Kevin. But tell
me more about the results of this study.
|
Kathy
|
After months of
training and some trial-and-error at the real M.R.I. scanner, they had the
first maps of brain activity, and determined which parts of her brain
distinguished the scents of familiar and unfamiliar dogs and humans.
They are just
beginning to answer basic questions about the canine brain; they cannot
ignore the striking similarity between dogs and humans in both the structure
and function of a key brain region: the caudate nucleus.
|
Pilar
|
What does “the
caudate nucleus” means?
|
Kathy
|
Those are rich in dopamine receptors, the caudate
sits between the brainstem and the cortex. In humans, the caudate plays a key
role in the anticipation of things we enjoy, like food, love and money.
In dogs, they
found that activity in the caudate increased in response to hand signals
indicating food. The caudate also activated the smells familiar humans. And
in preliminary tests, it activated to the return of an owner who had
momentarily stepped out of view.
|
Pilar
|
Do these findings
prove that dogs love us?
|
Kathy
|
Not quite. But
many of the same things that activate the human caudate, which are associated
with positive emotions, also activate the dog caudate. The ability to
experience positive emotions, like love and attachment, would mean that dogs
have a level of sentience comparable to that of a human child. And this
ability suggests a rethinking of how we treat dogs.
|
Pilar
|
I agree!, because
dogs have long been considered property. Thought the Animal Welfare Act of
1966 solidified the view that animals are thing. Now, by using the M.R.I. we
can no longer hide from the evidence!
|
Kathy
|
It’s true!, Dogs,
and probably many other animals (especially our closest primate relatives),
seem to have emotions just like us.
|
Pilar
|
If we went a step
further and granted dogs rights of personhood, they would be afforded
additional protection against exploitation. Puppy mills, laboratory dog
racing would be banned for violating the basic right of self-determination of
a person.
|
Kathy
|
They suspect that
society is many years away from considering dogs as persons. Perhaps someday
we may see a case arguing for a dog’s rights based on brain-imaging findings.
|
Pilar
|
Now, we can start
caring for our dogs and all animals, because we cannot demonstrate
scientifically why they love us, but we can feel their unconditional love for
us.
|
Kathy
|
That’s right! We
can defend their rights how innocent creatures and
sensitize to all people that their care and love.
|
Pilar
|
Kathy it’s late for
me.
|
Kathy
|
For me too, see
you the next week. And don’t forget to care your dog!
|
Pilar
|
Sure! See you the
next week
|